ScienceGuardians identifies anonymous intimidation & coordinated campaigns
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
Figure 2(a) shows 98% COD removal at 125 min using PEF, but Figure 3 indicates 100% COD removal at 150 min under the same conditions (COD 2500 mg/L, pH 3, H₂O₂ 300 mg/L, etc.). Why is there a discrepancy? Which value is reproducible?
Power consumption of H₂O₂ alone reported as 0 kWh/m³ in Figure 2(b)! This implies no energy input, yet H₂O₂ addition requires mixing and pumping. How was this zero value justified? Did you ignore the energy for chemical handling and stirring?