ScienceGuardians identifies anonymous intimidation & coordinated campaigns
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
While the study identifies significant differences in FSCP perceptions based on parental education levels, could the authors elaborate on whether school location (urban vs. rural) played a role in shaping these perceptions? Were any regional trends observed that might influence FSCP effectiveness? Additionally, the study suggests that FSCP policies can mitigate socioeconomic disparities in parental involvement, but were any longitudinal data or follow-up assessments considered?