With only 15 participants (7 from emergency management, 8 from health), how can the study justify sweeping recommendations for global AI adoption, GIS integration, and professionalization of emergency management? The authors acknowledge this limitation but then ignore it in the conclusion.
Under Operational challenges, the finding Local decision-makers feel sidelined by higher authorities; indigenous knowledge and NGO capabilities are underutilised is duplicated verbatim from the preceding row (Unilateral approach to disaster response) and also appears under Business-as-usual capabilities. This suggests careless data presentation.