ScienceGuardians

ScienceGuardians

Did You Know?

ScienceGuardians is the 1st fully verified journal club

Atmospheric Boundary Layer Eco-Environment Shanghuang Observatory: An Integrated Multiscale Research Platform in Southeastern China for Understanding Boundary Layer Processes, Atmospheric Chemistry Feedback, and Extreme Weather–Climate Linkages

Authors: Zifa Wang,Xiaole Pan,Yele Sun,Jinyuan Xin,Hang Su,Junji Cao,Jie Li,Ting Yang,Hang Liu,Weijie Yao,Weiqi Xu,Xueshun Chen,Wei Zhou,Yongjing Ma,Xueling Cheng,Jing Ye,Bo Hu,Rubin Jiang,Zhe Wang,Baozhu Ge,Lin Wu,Xinwei Li,Jinxi Li,Zichen Wu,Lei Kong,Mingming Zhu,Jia Jia,Xingyu Li,Xuekun Fang,Lanzhong Liu
Journal: Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publish date: 2025-11-14
ISSN: 0256-1530 DOI: 10.1007/s00376-025-5307-7
View on Publisher's Website
Up
0
Down
::

-The Abstract and Section 1 explicitly state that the ABLES observatory was “established in 2023.” However, Section 2.3 references “A year’s observations from 2022 to 2023,” Section 3.1 details “Field campaign I (October–November 2022),” and Section 3.4 mentions “~300 flask samples collected at ABLES” from “2021 to 2022.” How could observational data and field campaigns be conducted at ABLES prior to its stated establishment year? Please clarify this timeline discrepancy.
-The text states: “Organic aerosols accounted for 43%–61% of the total PM₁, while secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA: nitrate, sulfate, ammonium) contributed 37%–49%.” The upper bounds of these ranges sum to 110% (61% + 49%), which is a physical impossibility for mass fractions of PM₁. Are these ranges aggregated across different seasons/campaigns rather than representing simultaneous mass balance, or is this a typographical error?
-Table 2 lists “Storm Peak Laboratory” (Row 2) and “Storm Peak” (Row 13) as two distinct entries. They share virtually identical coordinates (40.455°N, 106.745°W vs. 40.455°N, 106.744°W) and represent the same facility. Is this an unintentional duplication that should be merged to maintain the table’s rigor and avoid redundancy?
-In Table 1, Item 8 is titled “High-Precision Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) / Methane (CH₄) Analyzer G2401,” yet the “Parameters” column explicitly lists “CO (ppm), CO₂ (ppm), CH₄ (ppm).” Should the instrument title be corrected to include Carbon Monoxide (CO) to accurately reflect the Picarro G2401’s capabilities, or is the inclusion of CO in the parameters column a typographical error?

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.