Several critical issues in this study warrant attention. The experimental methodology lacks sufficient detail for reproducibility, particularly regarding WS₂ exfoliation and composite preparation parameters. Data interpretations, such as XRD and Raman analyses, appear overly definitive without robust comparative validation or error analysis. High capacitance values are reported, but the absence of statistical variability raises concerns about reliability. Furthermore, some references seem misaligned with the claims made, raising questions about citation accuracy. I would thank the authors if they could address these issues to enhance the clarity and transparency of their work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e920/8e920f1eee319df60b75e9ec5d7602eb6b36f044" alt="ScienceGuardians"