ScienceGuardians hosts editors too
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
This study does a great job validating 3M™ Petrifilm™ for colostrum bacterial testing, but a couple of things could use more clarification. First, the new cut-off thresholds look promising, but were they tested on an independent dataset to see if they hold up outside the study population? That would help confirm their real-world reliability. Moreover, since freezing colostrum might underestimate bacterial counts, was there any comparison between fresh and frozen samples to measure the impact?