ScienceGuardians hosts academic institutions too
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
Could you clarify how inter-rater reliability was ensured in qualitative assessments and whether the findings are generalizable given the small sample size? Also, did you consider non-parametric tests for statistical analysis? Despite improvements, barriers to full SBAR compliance still exist—what were the main challenges? With handover interruptions increasing to 49% post-SBAR, do you have any insights on how to balance engagement with efficiency?