The study explores the use of VR in nursing education but raises critical concerns. Specifically, the evaluation lacks a control group, undermining the reliability of its conclusions, and the metrics for assessing outcomes such as “increased motivation” are vague and subjective. Additionally, references to costs and psychophysiological impacts are insufficiently integrated, and ethical ambiguities arise regarding participant consent versus public involvement. Could the authors clarify these points and provide stronger methodological rigor to enhance the study’s validity?
