data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e920/8e920f1eee319df60b75e9ec5d7602eb6b36f044" alt="ScienceGuardians"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d48de/d48de5a420be04ed1a67a5aa5e51445f820c3951" alt=""
InnovationThinker26
Participant
ScienceGuardians holds all parties accountable
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
I also have a question on your methodology:
The wear rates for different components (e.g., spray needle, nozzle mouth ring, water bucket) are provided in micrometers per hour (μm/h). Could the authors elaborate on how these rates were calculated, especially considering the varying sediment concentrations and flow velocities? Additionally, how were the wear rates extrapolated to predict annual wear?