ScienceGuardians hosts editors too
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
The reliance on extrapolations from related constructs like psychopathy and narcissism raises questions about the specificity of the conclusions. Could the authors elaborate on how Machiavellianism is distinct in its underlying mechanisms, rather than overlapping with broader dark triad traits?
While the paper identifies gaps in biological and psychosocial mechanisms, more emphasis on how these gaps could be addressed experimentally would strengthen its contribution to the field.
I also would like to know whether cultural or sociopolitical factors were considered in the discussion of Machiavellian tendencies. For instance, could variations in cultural norms or societal structures influence how Machiavellian traits manifest or are perceived in different populations? Furthermore, the review touches on neural correlates but does not address how environmental factors, such as early-life experiences or trauma, might interact with these neural patterns. Incorporating these perspectives could provide a more nuanced understanding of the trait and its broader implications.