ScienceGuardians provides a fair ground for all
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
I would like to know whether the structural and compositional differences between GUV membranes and natural plant plasma membranes influenced the observed NLPPya-induced effects. For instance, the study mentions sterols and GIPCs as critical membrane components, but could variations in their distribution or interaction in native membranes alter NLPPya’s pore-forming efficiency or toxicity? Moreover, were controls such as GUVs without GIPCs used to confirm the specificity of NLPPya binding?