The paper tackles a significant and timely subject; however, several concerns warrant attention. The reliance solely on the Scopus database for bibliometric analysis, without comparing it to other databases like Web of Science, raises questions about the comprehensiveness of the data; could the authors clarify this choice? The threshold criteria for keyword occurrences and their variability across analyses are not well-documented, which affects the methodological transparency; could this decision be elaborated on? Furthermore, the assertion that China’s dominance in EV research is solely due to funding overlooks potential confounding factors like international collaboration or regional policies—can the authors provide additional evidence to support this claim? Addressing these points would enhance the study’s clarity and reliability.
