ScienceGuardians provides a fair ground for all
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
Serious flaw in the sample design. The entire paper is framed around SMEs, yet the data in Table 2 clearly includes large firms (37.5% of the sample). This isn’t a minor oversight; it invalidates the core premise and all SME-specific conclusions. The title, abstract, and implications are fundamentally misleading. How can findings on “SME performance” be trusted when over a third of the data comes from large enterprises? This error demands a major correction.