ScienceGuardians hosts editors too
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
Several critical issues require attention. The study exhibits selection bias, as the choice of cities is not adequately justified, and endogeneity concerns, given that causality is assumed rather than rigorously tested. Additionally, the Super Efficiency SBM model’s assumptions may not hold, potentially skewing the results, while the fixed-effects regression lacks sufficient robustness checks. I invite the authors to address these issues to strengthen the study’s validity and impact.