ScienceGuardians prevents hostile interactions
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
Was data saturation reached with 16 interviews, and how does the small sample size affect generalizability?
Were valuation, value-added services, and personal attributes ranked or weighted, or is prioritization purely qualitative (Figure 2, Table 1)?
Were deal breakers (e.g., unfair valuations, lack of expertise) consistent across cases, or did they vary by industry/startup type (Section 4.3, Table 1) ?
