ScienceGuardians identifies anonymous intimidation & coordinated campaigns
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
While GC–MS analysis identified a range of metabolites, could the authors elaborate on whether any quantitative validation was performed? Were calibration curves or internal standards used to ensure accuracy in metabolite quantification? Also, while the antimicrobial and antiproliferative assays yielded interesting results, were any structure-activity relationship (SAR) analyses conducted to determine which specific metabolites contribute most to these bioactivities?