ScienceGuardians protects the academic community
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
I was wondering about one thing; you mentioned that you only included studies that cited or discussed the brain-first/body-first model. Couldn’t that accidentally leave out papers that might not reference the model but still have relevant data? Like, if a study didn’t mention SOC but still looked at RBD or autonomic symptoms, wouldn’t that be useful to include too? Just curious if that might make the support for the model look stronger than it really is.