ScienceGuardians

ScienceGuardians

Did You Know?

ScienceGuardians identifies anonymous intimidation & coordinated campaigns

Assessment of antimicrobial and anthelmintic activity of silver nanoparticles bio-synthesized from Viscum orientale leaf extract

Authors: Dugganaboyana Guru Kumar,Raghu Ram Achar,Jajur Ramanna Kumar,Ganamaedi Amala,Velliyur Kanniappan Gopalakrishnan,Sushma Pradeep,Ali A. Shati,Mohammad Y. Alfaifi,Serag Eldin I. Elbehairi,Ekaterina Silina,Victor Stupin,Natalia Manturova,Chandan Shivamallu,Shiva Prasad Kollur
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publish date: 2023-5-22
ISSN: 2662-7671 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-023-03982-1
View on Publisher's Website
Up
0
Down
::

I was going through research articles and found that the authors have published the same data in two different journals, as cited above. Here, I am concerned about Figure 5 of the above cited BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies paper and Figure 4 of the above cited Frontiers in Chemistry paper.

Importantly, both the papers have been published by the same research group (Dugganaboyana et al and Kumar et al). The authors have published the same FTIR data (Figure 5 of BMC and Figure 4 of Frontiers), claiming the data obtained using nanoparticles prepared from two different plant extracts.

It is important to note that these authors might be misleading the scientific community by duplicating and representing the same data in two different papers in two different journals. The spectra of both the articles look SAME but the authors misled the readers that one is of silver nanoparticles bio-synthesized from Viscum orientale leaf extract and the other one is of silver nanoparticles of Salacia oblonga root extract.

I feel it is a matter of research integrity, and concerns regarding the reliability of the data.

Below are the doi of both the concerned research articles.

1. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03982-1)
2. Frontiers in Chemistry (https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1114109).

Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.
All Replies

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

1 day, 19 hours ago

You’re totally right about the copied FTIR image; that’s a huge red flag.
Here’s are the Figures:

 

 

 

1 day, 19 hours ago

And I noticed something else sketchy in the XRD data. They claim their silver nanoparticle peaks are at around 3° and 1.4°, but anyone who’s done XRD knows silver peaks should show up around 38° and 44°. That’s, like, Nano 101.

 

 

Pretty sure they mixed up their units and reported “d-spacing” values (which are in Ångströms) as if they were “2θ” angles (which are in degrees). It’s a basic mistake, but it makes their data look totally wrong; or misleading.

So yeah, duplicated images and questionable XRD… not a good look. Solid catch on your part 

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.