The article contains critical shortcomings that warrant clarification. Insufficient specificity in linking cited works to claims raises concerns about the robustness of the conclusions. Methodological descriptions, particularly in case studies, are vague, hindering transparency and replicability. Additionally, the paper tends to overgeneralize AI’s capabilities in neuroscience without adequately addressing its limitations, potentially creating a misleading narrative. Ethical considerations, though mentioned, are superficially addressed despite their importance in AI applications within neuroscience. I would appreciate it if the authors could address these issues to enhance the clarity and reliability of the work.
