ScienceGuardians serves the community for free
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
Copied from: https://pubpeer.com/publications/1D808F3B2ED8155399A41F2D835F6A
Concern about Figure 3D:
Red boxes: The first two lanes of the Akt panel look unexpectedly similar.
Concern about Supplementary Figure 2.
Blue arrows: p-Erk1/2 blot: Lanes 1 and 2 look remarkably similar to lanes 3 and 4 in mirror image.
As much as I admire symmetry, I would not expect that in this blot. Could the authors provide a satisfactory explanation, please?
