ScienceGuardians identifies anonymous intimidation & coordinated campaigns
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
The concern about potential false negatives is valid. The study acknowledges that enzyme activity measurements can be influenced by sample handling and storage conditions. However, standardized protocols were followed to minimize variability, and quality controls were in place to ensure reliable enzyme activity readings.
I also have a question:
Did the study assess any correlations between enzyme activity levels and genetic variants in suspected cases? Including such an analysis could help differentiate between true GD cases, carriers, and potential false negatives.