The paper has several inconsistencies in data presentation, such as discrepancies between reported adsorption capacities in the text and tables, which need clarification. Methodological gaps include insufficient justification for model selection (e.g., Langmuir over alternatives) and inadequate experimental details, hindering reproducibility. Some claims lack direct evidence or rely on poorly aligned references, raising concerns about their validity. Lastly, overgeneralized conclusions about material performance and limited discussion on practical limitations could mislead readers. Addressing these issues through erratum would improve the study’s reliability.
