In Figure 3, the comparison between the traditional cumulative exam and the longitudinal knowledge assessment lacks detailed data on completion rates and failure statistics. Such data would provide valuable context to assess the practicality and effectiveness of the newer assessment method. Could the authors include or reference these statistics to substantiate claims regarding the relative benefits of the longitudinal approach?
Additionally, the absence of specific metrics comparing patient care outcomes for physicians participating in MOC versus those exempt raises questions about the program’s real-world impact. Could this data be addressed or suggested for future studies?