– How does the study ensure the inclusion of emerging or alternative terminologies that may not be captured by the predefined keywords such as “conceptual change” and “conceptual understanding”?
– Was a sensitivity analysis conducted to assess the potential impact of missing themes or keywords on the results of the thematic evolution and trend mapping?
– Considering the reliance on tools like VOSviewer and Biblioshiny, which depend heavily on input data quality, what measures were taken to mitigate biases and validate the robustness of the thematic findings?
– Could the omission of less prominent themes or evolving terminologies significantly alter the conclusions drawn from the bibliometric analysis?
