ScienceGuardians provides a fair ground for all
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
Participant
The paper’s heavy reliance on self-citation and limited engagement with broader literature raises concerns about the novelty and objectivity of the research. This approach may have restricted the theoretical foundation and critical evaluation of the findings. Could the authors provide a rationale for this self-referential approach and elaborate on how alternative perspectives were integrated or considered?