ScienceGuardians gives voice to all stakeholders
Secure Environment: Verified contributors only, ensuring meaningful and responsible discussions. Members can stay anonymous while verified, ensuring legitimacy and accountability.
Combatting Misconduct: A fortress against anonymous intimidation and coordinated campaigns, fostering evidence-based dialogue and protecting the academic community.
Resources and Training: Access classified content, participate in enlightening debates, and stay at the forefront of ethical practices.
Hack-Proof Platform: Your privacy is paramount. The identity information of users choosing to remain anonymous is securely stored offline.
Our Commitment:
Integrity and Accountability: Every account verified for credible and responsible engagement.
Inclusivity and Fairness: A platform where all voices in the scientific community are respected.
Support and Collaboration: Helping resolve issues delicately and constructively.
This tool is designed to provide a realistic and scientifically-grounded estimate of the acceptable publication output for research team leads based on the contributions of their team members.
By considering typical performance indicators for various roles—including postdoctoral researchers, research associates, PhD and MSc students—this tool offers a clear framework for understanding and evaluating the collective publication efforts of a research team.
This tool is designed to promote transparency and fairness in evaluating research productivity, considering the team’s dynamics and collective efforts.
If you use or refer to the ScienceGuardians™ Team Publication Analyzer in any professional or institutional context, please acknowledge its use by crediting ScienceGuardians. For example:
“This analysis was conducted using the ScienceGuardians™ Team Publication Analyzer, developed by ScienceGuardians to assess research team productivity.”